Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government

Implementing Criteria to Expand Clinical Trial Eligibility

Male doctor talking to a female patient with cancer

Guidelines for clinical trial eligibility are important to provide safety for patients and ensure that the study population is well characterized, but excessively narrow criteria can be an impediment to progress in the development of cancer therapeutics.

Background

The era of precision oncology increases the potential for limitations in clinical trial participation due to molecular profiling of participants’ tumors. Narrow eligibility criteria can exclude too many people, leading to study results that may not inform treatment options for the diverse groups of people with a particular cancer. Therefore, it is important for investigators to carefully consider whether each eligibility criterion in a clinical trial is too narrow and would unnecessarily exclude people.

Eligibility criteria must be as broad as safely possible to achieve diverse and representative populations in future clinical trials.

A 2017 joint statement from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Friends of Cancer Research (Friends) outlined recommendations from four working groups to expand and modernize clinical trial eligibility. These working groups provided recommendations and protocol template language to expand eligibility for the following criteria:

  • Brain metastases
  • Age < 18
  • HIV infection
  • Prior and concurrent malignancies and organ dysfunction, including cardiac, liver, and kidney function

Implementation of the Expanded Eligibility Recommendations

DCTD’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) has played a major role towards implementing the ASCO and Friends recommendations. CTEP’s efforts included:

  • Providing updated template language to principal investigators to implement the proposed expanded criteria into their clinical trial protocols. However, most CTEP-approved protocols in late 2018 and early 2019 had not adopted the ASCO/Friends recommendations.
  • Forming a CTEP pilot implementation team to review and require that study teams provide scientific justification for departure from the recommendations. The pilot led to 80-90% of trials implementing more inclusive eligibility. (1)
  • Incorporating the additional 2021 ASCO and Friends recommendations in protocol templates to further expand eligibility criteria in the areas of performance status, prior therapies allowed, concomitant medications, washout periods, and testing intervals. (2)

Conclusions

Reducing restrictive eligibility criteria makes it possible to enroll more participants to trials and finish enrollment faster, helping trials be more streamlined and efficient. CTEP continues to monitor eligibility criteria and work to ensure the least restrictive criteria are used in NCI-supported clinical trials.

Selected References

  1. Denicoff AM, Ivy SP, Tamashiro TT, Zhao J, Worthington KH, Mooney MM, Little RF. Implementing Modernized Eligibility Criteria in US National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Nov 14;114(11):1437-1440.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  2. Kim ES, Uldrick TS, Schenkel C, Bruinooge SS, Harvey RD, Magnuson A, Spira A, Wade JL, Stewart MD, Vega DM, Beaver JA, Denicoff AM, Ison G, Ivy SP, George S, Perez RP, Spears PA, Tap WD, Schilsky RL. Continuing to Broaden Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative and Inclusive: ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2394-2399.

    [PubMed Abstract]
  • Updated:

If you would like to reproduce some or all of this content, see Reuse of NCI Information for guidance about copyright and permissions. In the case of permitted digital reproduction, please credit the National Cancer Institute as the source and link to the original NCI product using the original product's title; e.g., “Implementing Criteria to Expand Clinical Trial Eligibility was originally published by the National Cancer Institute.”

Email